Research Pt 1:

What We’ve Learned So Far—And How You Can Help Shape What’s Next.

Your Voice Matters

We’re not here to lecture or prescribe.

This is an open experiment, and including as many voices as possible is essential.

That’s why we’re publishing the results of our pilot study for review and critique—to ensure that Hard As Nails is built on collaboration and shared understanding.

This isn’t about telling men what to do. It’s about inviting everyone into the conversation and discovering what works, together.

This is an open document. Please keep all comments polite, professional, and respectful.

What We’ve Discovered…

In 2024, we ran research groups that, despite limitations (see below), provided valuable insights and positive early indicators.

We’re sharing the research to invite constructive, collaborative feedback to strengthen and broaden what this could become.

This is not an academic study.

this iss an experiment in expanding the debate around masculinity without being patronizing or performative.

Here’s what the research suggests so far:

  • Increased Empathy
    The participating men reported a greater understanding of societal pressures and others’ experiences.

  • Greater Openness:
    Men felt more confident sharing personal thoughts and engaging in meaningful conversations.

  • Stepping Outside the ‘Man Box’
    Participants challenged traditional behaviours by calling in or out both positive and negative actions.

  • Mental Health Benefits
    Men experienced reduced stress, greater resilience, and a stronger sense of connection with others.

  • Increased Confidence
    While definitions of allyship vary, participants reported feeling more confident and able to engage in meaningful acts of support for others.

As one participant put it:

"It’s hard to do toxic masculinity when wearing nail polish."

Acknowledging Our Limits

This is just the beginning.

The initial research involved a small, self-selecting group. While the results are promising, there are limitations.

So, to overcome these, in February 2025, we’ll run a larger, more robust study expanding the sample across:

  • Geographies

  • Social and economic demographics

  • Levels of disability and mental health

  • Educational backgrounds

  • Professions

The first study used qualitative methods (diaries, surveys, and focus groups) and had limited long-term data.

For the more comprehensive study, we aim to use mixed methods, incorporating:

  • Robust psychological scales

  • Control groups

  • A representative sample

The following research phase is outlined in the research paper below which is open to comments and contributions to make this study as impactful and inclusive as possible.